Critical Thinking Mindset for Leaders & Professionals
الحصول على الكتيب
للحصول على كتيب بكامل محتويات الدورة برجاء ملء النموذج التالي ببياناتك الصحيحة
Program Professional Framework
Critical Thinking Mindset for Leaders & Professionals
Program Overview
Leaders are flooded with reports, opinions and data of uneven quality, and poor reasoning can be costly. This program develops the habits of critical thinking: questioning assumptions, evaluating evidence and sources, analysing arguments for logical fallacies, recognising cognitive biases in oneself and in teams, and reaching well-reasoned conclusions. Using the Paul-Elder framework of elements and intellectual standards, participants practise on realistic business cases, proposals and media claims, and learn to encourage constructive challenge in meetings while respecting the hierarchy common in Gulf organizations.
Learning Outcomes
- ✓Analyse a business argument by identifying its claim, evidence, assumptions and conclusion.
- ✓Evaluate the reliability of information sources and data used in reports and proposals.
- ✓Detect common logical fallacies and cognitive biases in written and verbal reasoning.
- ✓Apply the Paul-Elder intellectual standards of clarity, accuracy, relevance and depth to a decision.
- ✓Formulate probing questions that test proposals without damaging working relationships.
- ✓Facilitate a team discussion that surfaces dissenting views and reduces groupthink.
Target Audience
- Managers and team leaders who review proposals and make decisions
- Policy, strategy and planning professionals
- Analysts, auditors and advisers
- Professionals preparing for leadership roles
Detailed Program Modules
01The Critical Thinking Mindset
- Characteristics of critical thinkers
- Intellectual humility, curiosity and fair-mindedness
- Barriers to clear thinking at work
02Elements of Reasoning
- Purpose, question, information and assumptions
- Concepts, inferences and implications
- Paul-Elder intellectual standards
03Evaluating Arguments and Evidence
- Structure of arguments and claims
- Source credibility and data quality
- Correlation, causation and sampling pitfalls
04Fallacies and Cognitive Biases
- Common logical fallacies in business discussions
- Confirmation, anchoring and sunk-cost biases
- Debiasing techniques for individuals and teams
05Questioning and Constructive Challenge
- Socratic questioning techniques
- Challenging upward respectfully
- Red team and devil's advocate roles
06Critical Thinking in Leadership Decisions
- Reviewing proposals and business cases
- Making judgments with incomplete information
- Building a team culture of reasoned debate
Training Methodology
Applied Project & Assessment
Applied Project
Participants critically review a real or provided proposal, such as a business case or policy paper, documenting assumptions, evidence gaps, fallacies and biases, and submit a structured assessment with probing questions and a reasoned recommendation.
Assessment
Short diagnostic at the start, practical tasks linked to each learning outcome, and evaluation of the applied project against published criteria.